Hello again. Welcome and thanks for clicking on this the last YNN blog post for the month of July.
How was your weekend? Between Thursday and Sunday, I did something I haven't in a while. I went to see 3 movies in the same week. For this post, I'm going to share with you my opinions about all of them. This post is pretty long but only because its about 3 movies and I have a lot to say about them.
On Thursday afternoon, I went to one of those special Fathom Events. It was the showing of a 1979 film that has a very special place in my heart.

It's hard to believe that it's been 40 years since I took my nieces to see Kermit & Company's first film.
It has been and continues to be a part of my life after all these years. The Paul Williams/Kenny Ascher soundtrack being the thing that comes up the most. It's my all time favorite movie music.
I have a DVD and digital copy of The Muppet Movie. I can literally watch it anytime I want on my TV, phone, or computer. Yet I decided to go and enjoy it on the big screen once again.
I was one of only half a dozen people in the theater but I didn't mind. Sitting in alone in the front section, I sat and recited some of the lines and quietly sang along with the songs. This was a walk down memory lane with thoughts of family and friends who through this movie I have a "Rainbow Connection". All in all even though it happened in public with other people around, it was a very private personal experience.
On Friday, wife managed to get the afternoon off. We went to see the new version of Disney's The Lion King.
Let me just say that the things I write here about this movie are simply my opinions, not gospel. So yours may differ.
Visually, it was amazing. Even though its computer generated animation, it looked like real footage shot in Africa. The director, Jon Favreau, turned a Disney animated classic and reimagined it to look like a Disney Nature film. Its like nothing I've ever seen before; a visual treat.
I have seen both Disney's original animated and stage version of this story. Both capture the majesty of the story while remaining true to the medium in which it is set. In this new offering, Disney has managed to present Simba's story for a third time in a way that separates it from the previous two.
I think that one of the key reasons for Lion King's success over these many years and incarnations is the opening scene. The song sets the tone in the magnificence of the gathering of the animals. It has creatures of all shapes and sizes, even natural enemies, coming together to honor something greater than themselves. This version of that scene, although somewhat different still conveys that message. Something we all need to hear; especially these days.
There were many moments in the film were I was awed by or delighted with what I was seeing on the screen.
The most of the characters are animated to look very real and their mouth movements are subtle enough so as to not to be distracting.
Just like the stage play, the dialogue that's the same as the original is delivered with different emphasis but still works in the situation.
There are several other well known lines from the original (most of which I know by heart) that aren't used at all. Then there are scenes that either use entirely new lines or go in an unexpected ways. This happens mostly with Timon and Pumba.
The casting of these two is pretty good. Billy Eichner's Timon is a homage to Nathan Lane while at the same time he puts his own personal touch into the meerkat's character.
Seth Rogan plays Pumba as slightly more intelligent and a little more like Timon's equal than his side kick. The one thing that bothers me is the bathroom humor the director allowed. The inferred joke in the original would have worked in this one too.
Also this pair, at times try too hard to break the fourth wall and let the audience know that they are in on the joke.
I found the decision to make Timon & Pumba part of a community with a permanent home rather than total outcasts wandering place to place an interesting choice.
I like John Oliver's voicing of Zazoo. The fact that I know he's from South Africa must have planted a subliminal thought in my mind that he's the perfect alternative for the part. In this version Zazoo's a bit more proactive.
Unfortunately, some of my favorite Zazoo lines and moments are not there. His interaction with Scar, is almost totally cut out. Being launched into the air by the hyenas via the "birdie boiler" is not there, either.
But Zazoo's part in the song "Just Can't Wait To Be King" was included. The way that number was staged in the "reality" setting was different and impressive.
As you may have guessed by now, I don't think this is a perfect film by any means. The lack of ferocity in the villain characters was rather disappointing. Chiwetel Ejiofor's Scar was not anywhere as menacing as Jeremy Iron's.
Scar's rendition of "Be Prepared" was just confusing.
Because it's my favorite song in the original, I was very disappointed in the mess of spoken word and singing it was in this one.
I realized that a full on production number would not have been a good fit at that point in the picture. But the new version just felt awkward.
Also, even though they may have looked like they do in reality, the hyenas faces were uncanny and disturbing to look at. They lacked any distinction or personality. The humorous banter between two of the hyenas, seemed forced, got old really quick and just didn't work for me.
The two "nature" sequences: the scampering of the mouse before it gets caught by Scar and the path taken by Simba's fur takes to get to Raffiki, are both a bit too long.
On the other hand the initial "OMG I can't believe it's you" moment between Nola and Simba is not fleshed out enough. It seemed very rushed to me.
I could say a lot more about the movie but I think that's enough.
To wrap things up, for me, I liked this version of The Lion King. Now that I know where the story is going I may even like it more when I get to see it again. I'll just have to wait for the home video to find out.
The third film I went to see this past weekend was Quentin Tarantino's latest, "Once Upon A Time...In Hollywood". Until I started seeing commercials for this movie I had no idea it was being released.
A couple of weeks ago, I began to see TV commercials and social media buzz about it. I started reading the articles. I found out that it takes place in 1969 and that the Charles Manson family murders are part of the plot.
A couple of months ago I listened to an audio book called "Member of the Family" by Dianne Lake, a former follower of Manson's. The things I learned in that book helped me enjoy "Once Upon A Time...In Hollywood" a whole lot more than if I had gone in relatively uneducated about the infamous events of August 8, 1969.
The movie stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt. They play an aging actor, who's best days seem to be behind him, and his driver/stun double. Margot Robbie, plays actress and wife of Roman Polanski, Sharon Tate.
The first half of this 2 hour and 20 min feature moves relatively slowly. From the start it is made clear that it takes place in 1969 in Hollywood, CA. The story rotates between the 3 characters I mentioned above. Most of it seems very disconnected. But as it turns out it all pays off in the 3rd act.
As with all Tarantino films, the cast includes many recognizable actors playing supporting parts. This kept me wondering who would show up next. The most impressive unexpected performance is by 10 year old actress Julia Butters. She plays a child actress in a TV pilot that DiCaprio's character is part of.
The film really starts to get moving once Pitt's character picks up a member of the Manson Family and gives her a ride deep into a California valley to the Span Movie Ranch. Once a western TV and movie set now home to Manson's followers.
He has a very uneasy experience at the ranch where he crosses the line a bit in trying to find out about the ranch's owner, played by Bruce Dern. He ends up having to uses his fighting skills to allow him to make a close getaway.
As aware as I was to what was going in the film, I must admit that I missed the most important fact about it. Something which is alluded from the beginning and hinted at throughout. One of the hints I caught involved something stated about Walt Disney, that in our reality would not have been true.
This was not a reenactment of the Tate murders but rather an alternative tale. A telling of what might have happened in an alternate timeline.
I was rather surprised by the alternate way the events of August 8th was played out. It was a total turnaround of the tragic way it actually happened. In true Tarantino style, there is an "over the top" element in making for a not so cool climax and very satisfying ending.
What is set in motion for DiCaprio's character when all is said and done is the unstated cherry on the sundae that is the film.
Although it had a lot less action and was a lot more subtle than most other Tarantino movies, the way the story was told made the film. If it had been faster paced or more over the top it would have been disrespecting to the victims involved in the tragic events as they really happened.
I would recommend "Once Upon A Time In Hollywood" to anyone who remembers or is familiar with the Manson Family murders. It is also a snapshot of what Hollywood was like back in the late 60s.
There you have a very very long and detailed post about the 3 movies I saw over this past weekend. I hope I didn't go on too long and that you enjoyed reading my observations and opinions. If you have a different point of view about any of these films please comment below.
Finally, time for me to go. But I'll post again on Friday as I get ready for my performance in the SOKY's Got talent semi-finals. I'll see you then.